a quiet offering.

I am making a quiet offering to the people of Sandy Hook Elementary School and their community. If you would like to participate, go here for information.

Blessings.

And I offer you this poem by one of my favorite poets, Naomi Shihab Nye, posted by one of my favorite humans, Parker Palmer, today on Facebook.

Shoulders

by Naomi Shihab Nye

A man crosses the street in rain,
stepping gently, looking two times north and south,
because his son is asleep on his shoulder.

No car must splash him.
No car drive too near to his shadow.

This man carries the world’s most sensitive cargo
but he’s not marked.
Nowhere does his jacket say FRAGILE,
HANDLE WITH CARE.

His ear fills up with breathing.
He hears the hum of a boy’s dream
deep inside him.

We’re not going to be able
to live in this world
if we’re not willing to do what he’s doing
with one another.

The road will only be wide.
The rain will never stop falling.

About Patti Digh

Patti Digh is an author, speaker, and educator who builds learning communities and gets to the heart of difficult topics. Her work over the last three decades has focused on diversity, inclusion, social justice, and living and working mindfully. She has developed diversity strategies and educational programming for major nonprofit and corporate organizations and has been a featured speaker at many national and international conferences.

3 comments to " a quiet offering. "
  • I so love this poet – her words, her story. And yes, perfect for our current realities.Thank you for sharing it.

  • […] Patti Digh: On her blog 37 Days, in honor of the children who have died and a quiet offering, and a post on her blog 3x3x365 (co-authored by two other equally amazing […]

  • Thank you so much for sharing this beautiful poem. I am sharing an article from The Globe and Mail, Canada’s national newspaper, in the hopes that your readers in the US will read it, ponder it and then act. Let the war on domestic terrorism begin

    LAWRENCE MARTIN

    Special to The Globe and Mail

    Published Tuesday, Dec. 18 2012, 7:00 AM EST

    Nothing, we have been led to believe, can significantly change the American gun culture, a sickness so incongruous with the exceptionalism of that country.

    But the Newtown child massacre in Connecticut is on such an echelon of calamity that it, indeed, can be the harbinger of transformation. Americans may finally be starting to realize that the threat of terrorism at home is as great, if not greater, than the threat of terrorism from abroad.MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY

    MARGARET WENTE In the U.S., chances are mommy’s got a gun

    In shooting’s wake, tough debate in Newtown on gun control

    Newtown shootings underscore how confused we are about mental illness and violence

    Choose your statistic. As Nicholas Kristof has pointed out in The New York Times, more Americans die from gun-related homicides and suicides in the space of half a year than have died in the past quarter century of terrorist attacks, as well as the Afghan and Iraq wars combined.

    With Newtown, the politicians might clue in. They might have a change of mindset. They might be willing to devote even a small amount of those staggering sums they have devoted to their war on foreign terror to fight the terror at home.

    To date, they have decamped. Inconceivably, the National Rifle Association, despite the multiple mass shootings of recent years, has been gaining in strength. Gun-owning regulations have been eased in many quarters. Just last week, in the days before Newtown, Michigan legislators passed a bill allowing concealed weapons to be carried in schools. In a ruling for Barack Obama’s home state of Illinois, a federal appeals court struck down a ban on carrying concealed weapons.

    Though Democrats are at fault as well, it is primarily the Republicans who champion the NRA and the primitive minds who populate it. Newtown comes as another disgrace for what that party – already reeling from its antiquated positions on social and ethnic issues – stands for.

    Barack Obama has just been re-elected. He has political capital. He is a leader with moral authority. In his first term, he was feckless in addressing gun control. He didn’t even push hard for an assault weapons ban. He may have been mindful of the drubbing Bill Clinton took from the gun lobby when, shortly after taking office in 1993, he tried to take it on.

    But Mr. Clinton didn’t have a massacre of six- and seven-year-olds as a backdrop. Mr. Obama must move without hesitation. The danger is that today’s furor will be allowed to subside, that the “fiscal cliff” will overtake the firearms cliff on the news agenda. Facing the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, Mr. Obama might find it easier to attempt only modest anti-gun measures and move on.

    No one should underestimate the emotional attachment of people to their guns. Even in Canada, we have noted this. In urban centres, we simply could not believe the extent of the opposition to the long-gun registry. Our police forces supported the registry, but even that was not enough to save it.

    In addition to the NRA and Republican intransigence, Mr. Obama faces the reality of the Second Amendment, and the willingness of the courts to uphold it. But he can launch a campaign to change the mentality. He can couple legislative efforts with a massive advertising and education campaign that demonstrates how, in every other civilized society, stricter gun laws result in greatly reduced crime, murders, deaths.

    Mental health issues are correctly identified as a root cause of the killing rampages. But laws that allow people with such afflictions ready access to firearms make no sense. The prevailing gun psychology in the U.S. is tantamount to a mental-health issue itself.

    Adam Lanza’s mother had her house stocked with guns and assault weapons. She loved the single-mindedness of firing guns. She brandished her weapons to her landscaper on her porch. She took her son to target practice to show him how to aim. He learned well.

    For Mr. Obama – who, it is be hoped, has seen Lincoln – to change the mentality and the laws, will be an enormous, risk-laden undertaking. But he has an historic opportunity that he must not let pass.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *